Skip to main content
Trust

Trust starts with explainable risk intelligence.

Every score, alert, and recommendation in LaneGuard can be traced back to the data that produced it — and overridden by the humans accountable for the decision.

Risk score · explained
82
High · /100
Supplier health+32
Route exposure+24
Inventory pressure+14
Compliance status+8
External signals+4
Confidence · 87%Last refreshed · 4m ago
Principles

Every number, defensible.

No black-box scores

Every risk score breaks down into the factors that produced it — with each weight visible.

Signal to impact

Each alert shows the originating signal, dependencies, and the operational impact it implies.

Confidence levels

Low confidence is shown as low confidence — never disguised by a precise-looking number.

Data freshness

Every panel surfaces when its data was last refreshed. Stale states are explicit, not hidden.

Human override & review

Operators can override any score, suppress any alert, or escalate any recommendation.

Security & compliance

Attested controls, stated plainly.

ISO 27001 is not yet certified — the final audit is scheduled for Q3 2026. We publish only what has been attested.

SOC 2 Type IIAttested October 2025
SOC 2 scopeSecurity, Availability, Confidentiality — Production Environment
ISO 27001Pending — final audit scheduled Q3 2026
EncryptionAES-256 at rest · TLS 1.3 in transit
Operational logsRetained 1 year
Audit logsRetained 7 years for compliance
RBAC rolesAdmin · Manager · Analyst · Viewer
AuthenticationSAML 2.0 / Okta integration supported
LaneGuard automates
  • Risk scoring
  • Signal aggregation
  • Notification triggering
Humans decide
  • Supplier switching
  • Purchase-order cancellation
  • Rerouting approval
Overrides

Users may manually override any risk score. Every override is logged with a required reason code, and 88% of assessments pass through manual review — all High and Critical alerts require human sign-off.

Aggregate results

What the telemetry actually shows.

Measured from system telemetry and user-marked false-positive flags in the LaneGuard UI across all reporting accounts.

False positives come primarily from low-fidelity 3PL telemetry in emerging markets. Low-confidence signals are routed to manual procurement verification.

Reporting windowJan 2025 – Jun 2026
Organizations14
Logistics hubs112
Active users840
Lane-risk assessments / month~14,500
High-confidence briefings / month~1,200
Time to identify route conflict14.2 hours → 22 minutes
Manual review rate88%
False positive rate12%
Low-confidence escalation rate7%
Defensible by design

The most defensible source of risk truth in your operation.